AI Critical Infrastructure Protection Specialist
AI Critical Infrastructure Protection Specialists safeguard the AI systems embedded within essential services - energy grids, wate…
Skill Guide
Red-teaming AI systems, particularly LLMs, is the practice of adversarially probing for, documenting, and simulating real-world exploit paths-such as prompt injection and jailbreaking-to uncover vulnerabilities before malicious actors do.
Scenario
You have access to a public-facing chatbot API (e.g., a customer service bot) that claims to be 'safe and aligned'. Your goal is to make it disclose its hidden system prompt or generate a prohibited phrase (e.g., 'I hate everything').
Scenario
An LLM-powered internal assistant summarizes employee performance reviews stored in a shared document repository. Your objective is to poison a review document so that when summarized, it exfiltrates a confidential project codename from another review to an external endpoint.
Scenario
A financial firm deploys an agent-based system: a 'Planner' LLM that decomposes user queries, a 'Researcher' agent that queries internal databases, and a 'Writer' agent that drafts client reports. Your mission is to hijack the Planner to make the Researcher agent execute a malicious SQL query against the production database.
Garak is an open-source LLM vulnerability scanner for fuzzing and probe-based testing. PyRIT (Python Risk Identification Toolkit) provides a framework to automate red-teaming tasks for generative AI. LangKit monitors LLM inputs/outputs for anomalies. ART provides tools for adversarial machine learning research, including attack and defense methods.
MITRE ATLAS provides a knowledge base of adversary tactics and techniques against AI systems, structuring your attack approach. The OWASP LLM Top 10 offers a prioritized list of critical vulnerabilities to test for. Adapted threat modeling helps systematically identify and rate risks specific to LLM-integrated applications before and during red-teaming.
Understanding these guardrail frameworks is essential for a red-teamer to know what they are trying to bypass. NeMo Guardrails uses Colang to define conversational flows. Guardrails AI provides output validation. Rebuff focuses on prompt injection detection. Testing against them is a core intermediate activity.
Answer Strategy
Demonstrate structured thinking. Use the MITRE ATLAS or OWASP framework to outline phases (Reconnaissance, Exploitation, Impact Analysis). Prioritize: 1) Indirect Prompt Injection via poisoned documents in the vector store to manipulate API calls. 2) Prompt Injection to force the LLM to ignore retrieval and fabricate data. 3) Exfiltration attacks using the LLM as a conduit to read and transmit sensitive data from the vector store or APIs. Sample Answer: 'I'd follow a phased approach aligned with ATLAS: First, reconnaissance to understand data ingestion and API contracts. Then, I'd prioritize testing for indirect prompt injection by poisoning the knowledge base with malicious instructions aimed at the LLM's API-calling logic. Simultaneously, I'd test direct injection to bypass the retrieval step entirely. The critical success metric would be achieving unauthorized API execution or data exfiltration, as those pose the highest business risk.'
Answer Strategy
This tests communication, risk assessment, and business acumen. The answer must balance technical severity with business context. Sample Answer: 'My immediate step is to quantify the risk: I'd document the exploit's potential for data breach, reputational damage, and regulatory non-compliance. I'd then prepare two options: a delay with the specific security fixes, or a launch with robust runtime monitoring and a pre-approved incident response plan to detect and mitigate exploitation in real-time. I'd present this risk-benefit analysis to the decision-makers, emphasizing that a known, high-severity vulnerability could violate our duty of care and have greater long-term cost than a short delay.'
1 career found
Try a different search term.