AI Ad Testing Specialist
An AI Ad Testing Specialist designs, deploys, and analyzes AI-powered advertising experiments that maximize creative performance a…
Skill Guide
The use of SQL to extract, filter, aggregate, and combine structured data from advertising platform databases to analyze campaign performance, audience engagement, and return on ad spend (ROAS).
Scenario
Extract last 7 days of search campaign performance data segmented by campaign and ad group, including impressions, clicks, and cost.
Scenario
Join Facebook Ads impression data with Google Analytics conversion data on a matched user_id to calculate view-through conversion rates.
Scenario
Prepare datasets for a geo-holdout incrementality test by combining ad exposure logs, transaction data, and control group assignments from a data warehouse.
BigQuery is the industry standard for analyzing large-scale, serverless ad log data. Redshift and PostgreSQL are common in proprietary data stacks. A quality IDE provides syntax highlighting, auto-complete, and query profiling essential for writing and optimizing complex joins.
Prioritize CTEs for readability and debuggability. Structure queries in logical blocks (e.g., source, filter, join, aggregate). Understand that ad data is often modeled in a star schema with fact tables (impressions, clicks) and dimension tables (campaign, creative, audience).
Answer Strategy
The question tests ability to count distinct users, aggregate by two dimensions, and rank results. Use a CTE to first compute the unique user count per campaign/creative. Then, use a window function (ROW_NUMBER() or RANK()) partitioned by campaign_id and ordered by the count descending. Finally, filter for rank <= 3. Sample Answer: 'I'll first create a CTE to calculate COUNT(DISTINCT user_id) grouped by campaign_id and creative_id for the last 30 days. Then, I'll use ROW_NUMBER() OVER (PARTITION BY campaign_id ORDER BY distinct_users DESC) to assign a rank within each campaign. The final SELECT filters where rank <= 3.'
Answer Strategy
Tests data skepticism, validation methodology, and ownership. Focus on the process of understanding data lineage, applying filters to clean noise, using assertions (e.g., checking row counts before/after joins), and spot-checking against known business events. Sample Answer: 'My process starts with profiling each source: null rates, key cardinality, and time range coverage. I then build the join incrementally, using a staging CTE for each source with filters applied. After joining, I validate by comparing aggregate totals (e.g., total spend) against a trusted dashboard and by checking for unexpected drops in row count, which often indicate a broken JOIN condition. I document all assumptions and filters in the query comments.'
1 career found
Try a different search term.